In the textbook, language is not completely considered a result of genetics, but instead a social factor. Children learn the language they were the most exposed to, and are not predisposed to learn any one language. Language itself though can somewhat shape an individual's concept of reality since language is a large part of communicating with others. For example, for a tourist trying to speak with a native using the native language, the tourist may see some cultural language factors differently. Also, the way in which language is used can shape a person's concept of reality. For those who use the "proper" form of languagem they may have better job opportunities and a higher chance of becoming successful. With this added success comes a more positive view of reality and maybe a happier lifestyle for the individual. People who do not use the approved language form may not always receive these benefits, and as a result, not have such a positive outlook of reality.
After reading the different articles and the textbook chapter, I really think the way we see the world affects the language that we use. An individual who sees the world in a negative way may not consider communicating with others in the native language really important. Also, individuals who view the world positively may be more inclined to use language more often and in the more accepted form.
I think you're exactly right in the beginning because children who grow up in Spanish-speaking homes but also attend English-speaking schools, they will most likely be bi-lingual. But like in Taylor Britt's post, if you're born and raised in the South, you will probably speak with a southern accent but you will still speak the English language primarily. Your slang will be different from someone up North, however. So I think that the language(s) you learn and learn to speak and that shapes who you are has everything to do with the language(s) you hear most as a child and are close to.
ReplyDelete